Publications

 
 

2022

  1. Baur, C., Wienrich, C., & Hurtienne, J. (2022). Exploring perception using design as research method and fostering the design of multisensory data physicalisations. Position paper at the CHI’22 Workshop W13: Sketching Across the Senses: Exploring Sensory Translation as a Generative Practice for Designing Data Representations. https://sensorysketching.com/papers/

  2. Baur, C., Wienrich, C., & Hurtienne, J. (2022). Form follows mental models: Finding instantiations of image schemas using a design eesearch approach. In: F. Mueller, S. Greuter, R. A. Khot, P. Sweetser, & M. Obrsit (Eds.,) DIS’22: Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 586–598). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533451

  3. Bühler, D., Hemmert, F., Hurtienne, J., & Petersen, C. (2022). Designing Universal and Intuitive Pictograms (UIPP) – A detailed process for more suitable visual representations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 163, 102816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102816

  4. Gramlich, J., Pauli, S., Huber, S., Baur, C., & Hurtienne, J. (2022).Fin, Whale, Coin and Flatterer: Exploring Tangibles for Air Traffic Control. In TEI’22 Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Article No. 36, pp. 1-13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3502260

  5. Hohm, A., Happel, O., Hurtienne, J., & Grundgeiger, T. (2022). User experience in safety–critical domains: A survey on motivational orientations and psychological need satisfaction in acute care. Cognition, Technology & Work, 24(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00697-0

  6. Huber, S., Schulz, P., Hauke, E., & Hurtienne, J. (2022). Image-schematic metaphors in air traffic controllers’ language. In M. M. Hedblom & O. Kutz (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Image Schema Day. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol 3140. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3140/

  7. Hurtienne, J., Huber, S., & Baur, C. (2022). Supporting user interface design with image schemas: The ISCAT database as a research tool. In M. M. Hedblom & O. Kutz (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Image Schema Day. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol 3140. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3140/

  8. Nord, I., Ess, C., Hurtienne, J, & Schlag, T. (2022). Robotik in der christlichen Religionspraxis. Anschlussüberlegungen an erste Experimente in diesem Feld [Robotics in Christian Religious Practice. Follow-up reflections on first experiments in this field.]. In K. Merle & I. Nord (Eds.), Mediatisierung religiöser Kultur [Mediatization of religious culture](pp. 227-258). Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.

  9. Wolf, S., Luthe, S., Nord, I., & Hurtienne, J. (2022, July 14). Unavailability: Food for thought from Protestant theology. Interactions Blogs. ACM.  https://interactions.acm.org/blog/view/unavailability-food-for-thought-from-protestant-theology

  10. Wolf, S., Moerike, F., Luthe, S., Nord, I., & Hurtienne, J. (2022). Spirituality at the breakfast table: Experiences of christian online worship eervices. In S. Barbosa, C. Lampe, & C. Appert, & D. A. Shamma (eds.), CHI EA’22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article No. 316, pp. 1–7).ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519856

2021

  1. Grundgeiger, T., Hurtienne, J., & Happel, O. (2021). Why and how to approach user experience in safety-critical domains: The example of health care. Human Factors, 63(5), 821-832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819887575

  2. Hohm, A., Happel, O., Hurtienne, J., & Grundgeiger, T. (2021). “Ist ja gut, Schätzelein… shhh…”—Die Media Equation und Computers-Are-Social-Actors-Hypothese in der Akutmedizin [“It’s okay, honey. . . shhh. . .” - The Media Equation and Computers-Are- Social-Actors-Hypothesis in Acute Care]. Mensch und Computer 2021, 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3474227

  3. Hurtienne, J. & Maas, F. (2021, May). Die Masse macht’s: Hürden der Teilnahme an Klima-Demonstrationen [The numbers are important: Barriers to attending climate strikes]. Retrieved from https://fordemocracy.hypotheses.org/3041

  4. Löffler, D., Hurtienne, J., & Nord, I. (2021). Blessing robot BlessU2: A discursive design study to understand the implications of social robots in religious contexts. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(4), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00558-3

  5. Maas, F. & Hurtienne, J. (2021). Von Spaziergängen und fehlender KiTa: Beteiligung im Stadtteil Würzburg-Hubland [Of walks and missing kindergartens: participation in the Hubland district]. Retrieved from https://fordemocracy.hypotheses.org/3146

  6. Maas, F., Wolf, S., Hohm, A., & Hurtienne, J. (2021). Citizen needs – to be considered: Requirements for local civic participation tools. i-com Journal of Interactive Media, 20(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2021-0013

  7. Reinhardt, D., Borchard, J., & Hurtienne, J. (2021). Visual Interactive Privacy Policy: The better choice? In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article No.: 66, 1–12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445465

2020

  1. Bühler, D., Hemmert, F., & Hurtienne, J. (2020). Universal and intuitive? Scientific guidelines for icon design. In F. Alt, S. Schneegass & E. Hornecker (Hrsg.). Mensch und Computer 2020 - Tagungsband (pp. 91–103). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404983.3405518

  2. Gall, D., Preßler, J., Hurtienne, J., & Latoschik, M. E. (2020). Self-organizing knowledge management might improve the quality of person-centered dementia care: A qualitative study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 139, 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104132

  3. Hurtienne, J. (2020). Common conceptions of robots on the English web – A corpus linguistic analysis. Workshop Metaphors for Human-Robot Interaction at the12th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2020). Paper

  4. Hurtienne, J. (2020). Oh Toodles! The trouble with anthropomorphic robots. Workshop Metaphors for Human-Robot Interaction at the12th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2020). Paper

  5. Hurtienne, J., & Arnold, D. (2020). The naked truth? Clothing does not influence the robot experience. In T. Belpaeme, J. Young, H. Gunes, & L. Riek (Eds.), HRI ’20: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 269–271). New York: ACM. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3371382.3378362

  6. Hurtienne, J., Löffler, D., Hüsch, C., Reinhardt, D., Tscharn, R., & Huber, S. (2020). Happy is up, sad is down. 65 metaphors for design. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers. https://www.bispublishers.com/happy-is-up-sad-is-down.html

  7. Hurtienne, J., Maas, F., Carolus, A., Reinhardt, D., Baur, C., & Wienrich, C. (2020). Move&Find: The value of kinaesthetic experience in a casual data representation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 40(6), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2020.3025385

  8. Klüber, S., Löffler, D., Hassenzahl, M., Nord, I., & Hurtienne, J. (2020). Designing ritual artifacts for technology-mediated relationship transitions. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374937

  9. Klüber, S., Maas, F., Hohm, A., & Hurtienne, J. (2020). Participant’s view: Short-term evaluation of realizing PD ideals. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020, Volume 2, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385145

  10. Löffler, D., Luthe, S., Hurtienne, J., & Nord, I. (2020). From experiential to existential questions: An interdisciplinary view on social robots in religious settings. In B.P. Göcke, A. Rosenthal-von der Pütten (Eds.). Artificial Intelligence. Reflections in Philosophy, Theology, and the Social Sciences (pp. 293-305). Leiden: Mentis. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783957437488_019

  11. Reinhardt, D., Baur, C., Klüber, S., & Hurtienne, J. (2020). MindPeaks: Formative evaluation method of mindfulness meditation apps. Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 37–42. New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395855

  12. Reinhardt, D., Hurtienne, J., & Wienrich, C. (2020). Measuring mental effort via entropy in VR. In IUI’20: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion (p. 43–44). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379336.3381493

2019

  1. Huber, S., Bejan, A., Radzey, B., & Hurtienne, J. (2019). Proxemo or how to evaluate user experience for people with dementia. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, LBW2712:1–LBW2712:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313018

  2. Huber, S., Berner, R., Uhlig, M., Klein, P., & Hurtienne, J. (2019). Tangible objects for reminiscing in dementia care. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295632

  3. Klüber, S., & Hurtienne, J. (2019). Entwicklung digitaler Bürgerbeteiligungsformate: Partizipativ und Effizient? Mensch und Computer 2019 – Workshopband (S. 22-23). Bonn:  Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/25224

  4. Luthe, S., Nord, I., Löffler, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2019). Segensroboter „BlessU-2“: Forschungsimpulse für die Praktische Theologie angesichts der Entwicklung sozialer Roboter [Blessing Robot “BlessU-2”: Impulses for practical theological research given the development of social robots]. Pastoraltheologie, 108(3), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.13109/path.2019.108.3.107

  5. Reinhardt, D., Haesler, S., Hurtienne, J., & Wienrich, C. (2019). Entropy of controller movements reflects mental workload in Virtual Reality. IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR2019), 802–808. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797977

  6. Reinhardt, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2019). Only one item left?: Heuristic information trumps calorie count when supporting healthy snacking under low self-control. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 478:1–478:10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300708

  7. Wang, Y., Segal, A., Klatzky, R., Keefe, D. F., Isenberg, P., Hurtienne, J., … Barrass, S. (2019). An emotional response to the value of visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 39(5), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2019.2923483

2018

  1. Burmester, M., Haasler, K., Schippert, K., Engel, V., Tille, R., Reinhardt, D. & Hurtienne, J., (2018). Lost in Space? 3D-Interaction-Patterns für einfache und positive Nutzung von 3D Interfaces [Lost in space? 3D interaction patterns for the simple and positive use of 3D Interfaces]. In S. Hess & H. Fischer (Hrsg.), Mensch und Computer 2018 - Usability Professionals (pp. 53-66). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. and German UPA e.V.

  2. Haesler, S., Hurtienne, J., Ertle, F., & Theile, P. (2018). A classification schema for data physicalizations and a carbon footprint physicalization. Position Paper for the Workshop: Towards a Deign Language for Data Physicalization at IEEE VIS. Berlin: IEEE. Retrieved from http://dataphys.org/workshops/vis18/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2018/10/CarbonFootprint_Camera-ready_jh.pdf

  3. Huber, S., Bejan, A., Radzey, B., Berner, R., Murko, P. & Hurtienne, J., (2018). UX-Evaluationen in der Erinnerungspflege bei Demenz [UX evaluations in reminiscence care with people with dementia]. In R. Dachselt & G. Weber (Hrsg.), Mensch und Computer 2018 - Workshopband (pp.545-550). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.

  4. Hurtienne, J. (2018). Possibilities of human data embodiment: 100% City. Position Paper for the Workshop: Towards a design language for Data Physicalization at IEEE VIS. Berlin: IEEE. Retrieved from http://dataphys.org/workshops/vis18/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2018/10/Rimini_IEEE_180903small.pdf

  5. Hurtienne, J. (2018). Resilienztrainings – kein Mittel gegen den täglichen Stress [Resilience trainings are not a means against stress]. Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation, 87(1), 36-38.

  6. Hurtienne, J., & Koch, K. (2018). Resilienz – Ein schädlicher Begriff für den Umgang mit Stress am Arbeitsplatz? [Resilience – A harmful concept in coping with stress at the workplace?] In M. Karidi, M. Schneider, & R. Gutwald (Eds.), Resilienz – Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zu Wandel und Transformation (pp. 141–157). Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19222-8_8

  7. Löffler, D., Sperlich, B. & Hurtienne, J., (2018). Designing a digital companion to promote physical activity among sedentary office workers. In R. Dachselt & G. Weber (Hrsg.), Mensch und Computer 2018 - Workshopband. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.

  8. Löffler, D., Tscharn, R., & Hurtienne, J. (2018). Multimodal effects of color and haptics on intuitive interaction with tangible user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 647–655). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173257

  9. Reinhardt, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2018). Cursor entropy reveals decision fatigue. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion (p. 31:1–31:2). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180308.3180340

  10. Reinhardt, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2018). The impact of tangible props on gaming performance and experience in gestural interaction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 638–646). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173258 [Honorable Mention]

  11. Reinhardt, D., Kuge, J., & Hurtienne, J. (2018). CHAI: Coding heuristics for assessing intuitive interaction. In A. Marcus & W. Wang (Eds.). Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice. DUXU 2018 (pp. 528–545). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91797-9_38

2017

  1. Grundgeiger, T., Hester, J., Held, V., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). Beyond knowledge acquisition: Medical device training as a cooperative process. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 187–190). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3026315

  2. Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). Locating theories of embodiment along three axes: 1st–3rd Person, Body-Context, Practice-Cognition. Workshop Position Paper for CHI 2017 Workshop on Soma-Based Design Theory, Denver, CO, USA. http://www.ehornecker.de/Papers/SomaestheticWS-embodimentshortie.pdf

  3. Huber, S., Berner, R., Ly-Tung, N., Preßler, J. & Hurtienne, J., (2017). Evaluation eines Public Displays für Menschen mit Demenz [Evaluation of a public display for people with dementia]. In: M. Burghardt, R. Wimmer, C. Wolff & C. Womser-Hacker (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2017 - Workshopband (pp. 571-576). Regensburg: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.

  4. Huber, S., Preßler, J., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). Proxemo: A demonstrator for emotion logging by proxy. In N. Hendriks & A. Wilkinson (eds.), Dementia Lab Event - Stories from design and research (pp. 161-164). Dortmund: Fachhochschule.

  5. Huber, S., Preßler, J., Tung, N. L., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). Evaluating interaction-triggered emotions in people with dementia. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2659–2667). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053251

  6. Hurtienne, J. (2017). How Cognitive Linguistics inspires HCI: Image schemas and image-schematic metaphors. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 33 (1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1232227

  7. Hurtienne, J. (2017, January). Neues Prekariat im digitalen Wandel der Arbeit: Kann Resilienz helfen? [A new precariat in the digital transformation of work: Can resilience help?] Retrieved from http://resilienz.hypotheses.org/1167

  8. Hurtienne, J., & Reinhardt, D. (2017). Teaching data physicalisation to HCI students – A case report. Position Paper for the Workshop: Pedagogy & Physicalization: Designing Learning Activities around Physical Data Representations at Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’17). Edinburgh, UK: ACM. Retrieved from http://dataphys.org/workshops/dis17/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2017/06/DISS2017_DataPhys_Position_final_170528.pdf

  9. Hurtienne, J., & Reinhardt, D. (2017). Texture metaphors and tangible interaction: No smooth relationship? In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 79–87). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3024986

  10. Kraft, J. F., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). Transition animations support orientation in mobile interfaces without increased user effort. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (p. 17:1–17:6). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098566

  11. Löffler, D., Giron, L., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). Night mode, dark thoughts: Background color influences the perceived sentiment of chat messages. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2017 (pp. 184–201). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67684-5_12

  12. Löffler, D., Kaul, A., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). Expected behavior and desired appearance of insect-like desk companions. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 289–297). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3024992

  13. Maas, F., Tscharn, R., & Hurtienne, J., (2017). Alterseffekte bei der Nutzung von Online-Mediatheken - eine Usability-Evaluation [Age effects in the use of online media libraries – a usabilty evaluation]. In: M. Burghardt, R. Wimmer, C. Wolff & C. Womser-Hacker (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2017 - Workshopband (pp. 577-583). Regensburg: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. DOI:10.18420/muc2017-ws17-0411

  14. Reinhardt, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). Interaction under pressure: Increased mental workload makes issues of intuitive interaction visible. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 67–71). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064857.3079121

  15. Tscharn, R., Latoschik, M. E., Löffler, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). “Stop over There”: Natural gesture and speech interaction for non-critical spontaneous intervention in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 91–100). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136755.3136787

  16. Tscharn, R., Schaper, P., Aschenbrenner, D., Löffler, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2017). Benutzungsschnittstellen für Industrieroboter – Eine Usability-Evaluation [User interfaces for industrial robots – a usability evaluation]. Wissenschaft trifft Praxis, 6, 72-77. http://mittelstand-digital.de/DE/Begleitforschung/veroeffentlichungen,did=800208.html

2016

  1. Huber, S., Preßler, J. & Hurtienne, J. (2016). Anpassung von Contextual Design für den Kontext Demenz [Adapting Contextual Design to the context of dementia]. In S. Franken, U. Schroeder, T. Kuhlen (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2016 – Kurzbeiträge. Aachen: Gesellschaft für Informatik. http://dx.doi.org/10.18420/muc2016-mci-0235

  2. Hurtienne, J. (2016, August). Resilienz: Ein schädlicher Begriff für den Umgang mit Stress am Arbeitsplatz? [Resilience: A harmful concept for coping with stress at work?]. Retrieved from http://resilienz.hypotheses.org/1031

  3. Hurtienne, J. (2016). Techniknutzung im Alter [Technology use and ageing]. In Ernst, S. (Ed.), Alter und Altern. Herausforderungen für die theologische Ethik (pp. 251-269). Freiburg, Schweiz: Academic Press.

  4. Hurtienne, J., & Meschke, O. (2016). Soft Pillows and the Near and Dear: Physical-to-Abstract Mappings with Image-Schematic Metaphors. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 324–331). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2839462.2839483

  5. Löffler, D., Arlt, L., Toriizuka, T., Tscharn, R., & Hurtienne, J. (2016). Substituting Color for Haptic Attributes in Conceptual Metaphors for Tangible Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 118–125). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2839462.2839485

  6. Löffler, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2016). Color and Haptic Attributes in Cross-Domain Mappings. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 1135-1136.

  7. Löffler, D., Kaul, A., Tscharn, R., & Hurtienne, J. (2016). Autonomous Desktop Companions: Comparing Interactive Zoomorphs. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (pp. 682–685). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968559

  8. Ly, N. T., Preßler, J., Gall, D., Hurtienne, J., & Huber, S. (2016). Tangible Interaction Drawers for People with Dementia: Retrieving Living Experiences from Past Memories. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (pp. 157–160). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2971434

  9. Ly, N. T., Serna, A., Aknine, S., & Hurtienne, J. (2016). Towards Supporting Caregivers to Monitor the Whereabouts of People with Dementia. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (p. 57:1–57:4). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971565

  10. Ly, N. T., Tscharn, R., Preßler, J., Huber, S., Aknine, S., Serna, A., & Hurtienne, J. (2016). Smart Lighting in Dementia Care Facility. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (pp. 1636–1639). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968526

  11. Preßler, J., Huber, S., Ly, N.T., & Hurtienne, J. (2016). Tangibles für Menschen mit Demenz: Erinnerungen zum Anfassen [Tangibles for people with dementia – memories to grasp]. In B. Weyers & A. Dittmar (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2016 – Workshopbeiträge. Aachen: Gesellschaft für Informatik. http://dx.doi.org/10.18420/muc2016-ws10-0003

  12. Schaper, P., Tscharn, R., Löffler, D. & Hurtienne, J. (2016). HCI in der Lehre – am Puls der Zeit? [HCI in Teaching – in touch with latest trends?]. In B. Weyers & A. Dittmar (Eds.),
    Mensch und Computer 2016 – Workshopbeiträge. Aachen: Gesellschaft für Informatik. http://dx.doi.org/10.18420/muc2016-ws06-0002

  13. Tscharn, R., Außenhofer, T., Reisler, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2016). “Turn Left After the Heater”: Landmark Navigation for Visually Impaired Users. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 295–296). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982195

  14. Tscharn, R., Ly-Tung, N., Löffler, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2016). Ambient Light As Spatial Attention Guidance in Indoor Environments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (pp. 1627–1630). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968524

  15. Weiss, M., Hurtienne, J., Hartmann, S., & Blum, C. (2016). Beiträge zu einer Theorie des Umgangs mit psychischen Belastungen: Sekundäreffekte auf individueller, kollektiver und korporativer Ebene [Contributions towards a theory of coping with stress: secondary effects on the individual, team and organisational level]. In Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft (Hrsg.) Arbeit in komplexen Systemen. Digital, vernetzt, human?! (B.6.9,  S. 1-5). Dortmund: GfA Press.

  16. Winkler, A., Baumann, K., Huber, S., Tscharn, R., & Hurtienne, J. (2016). Evaluation of an Application Based on Conceptual Metaphors for Social Interaction Between Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 1148–1159). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2901790.2901876

2015

  1. Blum, C., Hartmann, S., Hurtienne, J., Weiss, M. (2015). First and second order resilience against stress at the workplace. Working Paper 15/3. Bayersicher Forschungsverbund ForChange. Retrieved from http://resilienz.hypotheses.org/541

  2. Grundgeiger, T., Roewer, R, Grundgeiger, J., Hurtienne, J. &., Happel, O. (2015). Body posture during simulated tracheal intubation: Video laryngoscopy causes a more ergonomic posture than direct laryngoscopy for experts and novices. Anaesthesia, 70(12), 1375-1381. doi:10.1111/anae.13190

  3. Hurtienne, J., Klöckner, K., Diefenbach, S., Nass, C., & Maier, A. (2015). Designing with Image Schemas: Resolving the Tension Between Innovation, Inclusion and Intuitive Use. Interacting with Computers, 27 (3), 235–255. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwu049

  4. Hurtienne, J., Löffler, D., Gadegast, P., & Hußlein, S. (2015). Comparing Pictorial and Tangible Notations of Force Image Schemas. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 249–256). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2677199.2680553

  5. Ikeda, M., M., Toriizuka, T., Löffler, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2015). Conveying Opposite System States Through Color – Japanese Population Stereotypes of Hue-Concept Associations. In G. Lindgaard & D. Moore (Eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. Melbourne, 9-14 August, 2015. Retrieved from http://ergonomics.uq.edu.au/iea/proceedings/Index_files/papers/1237.pdf

  6. Löffler, D., Paier, W., Toriizuka, T., Ikeda, M., & Hurtienne, J. (2015). Augmented Happiness: Simple Color Changes Influence Users’ Conceptual Choices. In J. Abascal, S. Barbosa, M. Fetter, T. Gross, P. Palanque, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 (Vol. IV, pp. 248–255). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22723-8_20

  7. Löffler, D., Toriizuka, T., Sakakibara, Y., Schaper, P., & Hurtienne, J. (2015). Examining the Design Space of Insect Inspired Notifications. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 145–148). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2800835.2800896

  8. Löffler, D., Wallmann-Sperlich, B., Wan, J., Knött, J., Vogel, A., & Hurtienne, J. (2015). Office Ergonomics Driven by Contextual Design. Ergonomics in Design, 23 (3), 31-35. doi: 10.1177/1064804615585409

  9. Ly, N. T., Hurtienne, J., Tscharn, R., Aknine, S., & Serna, A. (2015). Towards Intelligent and Implicit Assistance for People with Dementia: Support for Orientation and Navigation. In Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 31:1–31:4). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2829875.2829899

  10. Toriizuka, T., Löffler, D., Sakaibara, Y., & Hurtienne, J. (2015). Insect Behavior as Source of Inspiration for Designing Intuitive Human-Computer Interaction. In G. Lindgaard & D. Moore (Eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. Melbourne, 9-14 August, 2015. Retrieved from http://ergonomics.uq.edu.au/iea/proceedings/Index_files/papers/781.pdf

  11. Tscharn, R., Löffler, D., Lipp, D., Kuge, J., & Hurtienne, J. (2015). Senior, Follower and Busy Grumbler: User Needs for Pervasive Participation. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 801–806). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2800835.2804400

2014

  1. Hurtienne, J., Landeck, M., Ludwig, S., & Löffler, D. (2014). Beyond eye tracking analogies: Cursor trajectories as subtle cues to detect distracting UI elements. In M. Jones, P. Palanque, A. Schmidt, & T. Grossman (Eds.), CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1789-1794). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2559206.2581363

  2. Gadegast, P., Löffler, D., Goutrié, C., Hußlein, S., & Hurtienne, J. (2014). Supporting interaction design inspired by force image schemas. In T. Herbst & P. Uhrig (Hg.), Constructions & Cognition (pp. 32-33). Erlangen: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität.

  3. Löffler, D., Lindner, K., & Hurtienne, J. (2014). Mixing languages? Image schema inspired designs for rural Africa. In M. Jones, P. Palanque, A. Schmidt, & T. Grossman (Eds.), CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1999-2004). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2559206.2581356

  4. Hurtienne, J., Jetter, H.-C., Marquardt, N., & Pederson, T. (2014). Ubicomp beyond devices: people, objects, space and meaning. In V. Roto, J. Häkkilä, K. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, O. Juhlin, T. Olsson, & E. Hvannberg (Eds.), NordiCHI '14 Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (pp. 837-840). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2639189.2654842

  5. Hurtienne, J. (2014). Primary Metaphors Describe Standard Meanings of Topological Arrangements. Paper presented at the Workshop Ubicomp beyond Devices: Objects, People, Space and Meaning at the NordiCHI '14 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Helsinki. Retrieved from http://www.meaningofspace.org/Papers_files/posm14_submission_7.pdf

  6. Hurtienne, J. (2014, July). Resilienz und die Kommunikation mit Maschinen [Resilience and the communication with machines]. Retrieved from http://resilienz.hypotheses.org/184

  7. Ikeda, M., Toriizuka, T., Löffler, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2014). [A Study on Color Expression of the Exact Opposite Concept (Part 2) - Responsiveness of Image Schema]. The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, 50 (Supplement), 350-351. doi:10.5100/jje.50.S350

  8. Ikeda, M., Toriizuka, T., Löffler, D., & Hurtienne, J. (2014). The Color of Valence – Relating Hue to Positive and Negative Concepts. Journal of Ergonomics in Occupational Safety and Health, 16 (Supplement), 59.

  9. Gadegast, P., Löffler, D., Goutrié, C., Hußlein, S., & Hurtienne, J. (2014). FIS-Dials: Interaktionsmodelle zur Unterstützung der Gestaltung haptischer Benutzungsschnittstellen [FIS-Dials: Interaction models supporting the design of haptic user interfaces]. In M. Koch, A. Butz, & J. Schlichter (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2014 – Online Workshopband. Link

  10. Schmitt, H., Hess, A., Hess, S., Maier, A., Löffler, D. & Hurtienne, J. (2014). Intuitive Benutzbarkeit messen – Eine Evaluationstoolbox für Software, Apps und technische Produkte [Measuring intuitive use - an evaluation toolbox for software, apps and technical products]. In H. Brau (Hrsg.), Usability Professionals 2014. Stuttgart: German UPA. Retrieved from http://up.germanupa.de/publikationen/aktuell-up14/shortpaper/intuitive-benutzbarkeit-messen.html

  11. Löffler, D. & Hurtienne, J. (2014). Image-schematic color metaphors. In 10th Conference of the Association for Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 202-203). Cagliari: RaAM.

  12. Hurtienne, J., Löffler, D., & Schmidt, J. (2014). Zur Ergonomie prosozialen Verhaltens: Kontextabhängige Einflüsse von Körperhaltungen auf die Ergebnisse in einem Diktatorspiel [On the ergonomics of prosocial behaviour: context-dependent influences of body posture on the results in a dictator game]. In A. C. Schütz, K. Drewing, & K. R. Gegenfurtner (Eds.), TeaP 2014 – Abstracts of the 56th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (p. 117). Lengerich: Papst.

  13. Hurtienne, J., Stilijanow, U., & Junghanns, G. (2014). Time and work pressure in current working life. In C. Korunka & P. Hoonakker (Eds.), The Impact of ICT on Quality of Working life (pp. 63-85). Dordrecht: Springer Science. Link

  14. Hurtienne, J. (2014). Non-linguistic applications of Cognitive Linguistics: On the usefulness of image-schematic metaphors in User Interface Design. In J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 301-324). London: Bloomsbury. Link

  15. Hurtienne, J. (2014). The meaning of space in interaction. Dagstuhl Reports, 3 (11), 39. doi:10.4230/DagRep.3.11.29

2013

  1. Löffler, D., Hess, A., Maier, A., Hurtienne, J., & Schmitt, H. (2013). Developing intuitive user interfaces by integrating users’ mental models into requirements engineering. The 27th International British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference. London: Brunel University. Paper

  2. Hurtienne, J. (2013). Inter-coder reliability of categorising force-dynamic events in human-technology interaction. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 1(1), 59-77. doi:10.1515/gcla-2013-0005

  3. Löffler, D., Hess, A., Hurtienne, J., Lange, K., Maier, A., & Schmitt, H. (2013). Gestaltung intuitiv benutzbarer Softwareanwendungen mit der IBIS Methode [Designing software applications for intuitive interaction using the IBIS method]. i-com Zeitschrift für interaktive und kooperative Medien, 12(2), 48-54. doi:10.1524/icom.2013.0016

  4. Pusch, A., Naumann, A.B., Brandt, M., & Hurtienne, J. (2013). Towards designing a long-term assistive environment for people with dementia. Include 2013 Proceedings. London: Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design. Retrieved from http://include13.kinetixevents.co.uk/rca/rca2013/paper_final/F1133_4482.PDF

  5. Hurtienne, J., Horn, A.-M., Langdon, P. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2013). Facets of prior experience and the effectiveness of inclusive design. Universal Access in the Information Society,12 (3). doi:10.1007/s10209-013-0296-1

  6. Hurtienne, J., & Israel. J.H. (2013). PIBA-DIBA or How to blend the digital with the physical. Paper presented at the Workshop on Blended Interaction at the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paris. Retrieved from http://hci.uni-konstanz.de/downloads/blend13_hurtienne.pdf

  7. Pusch, A., Brandt, M., Serna, A., Aknine, S., & Hurtienne, J. (2013). How would a smart radio for people with dementia do? A case study. RAatE – Recent Advances in Assistive Technology & Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.raate.org.uk/content/view-papers/887/

2012

  1. Pusch, A., Naumann, A.B., & Hurtienne, J. (2012). Adaptive Aid Selection for Assisting People with Dementia. Paper presented at the 17th Annual CyberPsychology and CyberTherapy Conference. Brussels.

  2. Löffler, D., Hurtienne, J., & Maier, A. (2012). Die Brücke zwischen Anforderungen und Design schlagen. Mit Hilfe von Image Schemata Gestaltungsentscheidungen systematisch treffen. [Building bridges between requirements and design. Systematic design decisions with image schemas] . In H. Brau, A. Lehmann, K. Petrovic & M.C. Schroeder (Hrsg.) Usability Professionals 2012 (S.170-175). Stuttgart: German UPA.

  3. Israel, J.H., Hurtienne, J. & Weber, K. (2012). Be-greifbar oder Virtuell? Der Designer entscheidet [Tangible or virtual? Its the designer’s decision]. In B. Robben & H. Schelhowe (Hrsg.), Be-greifbare Interaktion [Tangible Interaction] (S. 41-76). Bielefeld: transcript.

2011

  1. Göllner, S., Hurtienne, J., Göllner, U., & Naumann, A.B. (2011). Mobile technology keeping people with dementia independent and socially active. In Proceedings of MobileHCI 2011 (pp. 593-598). Stockholm: ACM.

  2. Naumann, A. B., Hurtienne, J., Göllner, S., Langdon, P. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2011). Technology supporting the everyday life of people with dementia. Include 2011 Proceedings. London: Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design. Retrieved from http:// include11.kinetixevents.co.uk/rca/rca2011/paper_final/F389_2280.PDF

  3. Hurtienne, J. & Junghanns, G. (2011). Arbeitsstrategien erfolgreicher Wissensarbeiter: Erkenntnisse aus biographischen Interviews mit Wissenschaftlern [Work strategies of successful knowledge workers: Insights from biographical interviews with scholars]. In F.W. Nerdinger & S.Curth (Eds.), Arbeit – Organisation – Wirtschaft. Wissenschaft für die Praxis.7. Tagung der Fachgruppe Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (pp. 243-244). Rostock: Universität Rostock.

  4. Hurtienne, J., Junghanns, G., & Morschhäuser, M. (2011). Fachtagung “Immer schneller, immer mehr” [Symposium “faster and faster, more and more” on stress and work design in knowledge and service work]. baua Aktuell, (4), 14-15. Retrieved from http://www.baua.de/de/Publikationen/BAuA-AKTUELL/2011-4/4-2011.html

  5. Junghanns, G., Hurtienne, J., & Stilijanow, U. (2011). Arbeitsintensität/Zeit- und Leistungsdruck bei Dienstleistungstätigkeiten – Entstehungszusammenhänge und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten im Bereich der Arbeitsorganisation [Work intensity, time and work pressure in service work – Origins and possibilities for work design with regard to work organisation]. In F.W. Nerdinger & S.Curth (Eds.), Arbeit – Organisation – Wirtschaft. Wissenschaft für die Praxis. 7. Tagung der Fachgruppe Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (p. 10). Rostock: Universität Rostock.

  6. Hurtienne, J. (2011). Image schemas and design for intuitive use. Exploring new guidance for user interface design (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin). Retrieved from http://opus.kobv.de/tuberlin/volltexte/2011/2970/pdf/hurtienne_joern.pdf

2010

  1. Hurtienne, J., Stößel, C., Sturm, C., Maus, A., Rötting, M., Langdon, P., & Clarkson, P. J. (2010). Physical gestures for abstract concepts. Inclusive design with primary metaphors. Interacting with Computers, 22, 475-484. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.08.009

  2. Naumann, A., & Hurtienne, J. (2010). Benchmarks for intuitive interaction with mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 401-402). Lisbon, Portugal: ACM. doi:10.1145/1851600.1851685. *** Nominated for the Best Publication Award ***

  3. Naumann, A., Wechsung, I., & Hurtienne, J. (2010). Multimodal Interaction: A Suitable Strategy for Including Older Users? Interacting with Computers. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.08.005

  4. Hurtienne, J. (2010). Inter-coder reliability of categorising force-dynamic events. In Fourth International Conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (pp. 54-55). Bremen: University of Bremen.

  5. Hurtienne, J., & Langdon, P. (2010). Keeping warm in winter: Image-schematic metaphors and their role in the design of central heating controls. In Fourth International Conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (pp. 53-54). Bremen: University of Bremen.

  6. Hurtienne, J., Horn, A.-M., & Langdon, P. M. (2010). Facets of prior experience and their impact on product usability for older users. In P. Langdon, P. J. Clarkson & P. Robinson (Eds.), Designing inclusive interactions (pp. 123-132). London: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84996-166-0_12

  7. Hurtienne, J., & Naumann, A. (2010). QUESI – A questionnaire for measuring the subjective consequences of intuitive use. In R. Porzel, N. Sebanz & M. Spitzer (Eds.), Interdisciplinary College 2010. Focus Theme: Play, Act and Learn (p.  536). Sankt Augustin: Fraunhofer Gesellschaft. Abstract  Poster

2009

  1. Hurtienne, J. (2009). Cognition in HCI: An ongoing story. Human Technology, 5(1), 12-28. Paper

  2. Israel, J.H., Hurtienne, J., Pohlmeyer, A., Mohs, C., Kindsmüller, M.C., & Naumann, A. (2009). On tangible user interfaces, physicality and intuitive use. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 2(4), 348-366. doi:10.1504/IJART.2009.029240

  3. Hurtienne, J., Prümper, J. & Rötting, M. (2009). When enterprise resource planning needs software ergonomics: Some typical scenarios. In Proceedings of the 17th World Congress on Ergonomics (IEA 2009) [CD-ROM]. Beijing, China: IEA. Paper

  4. Hurtienne, J., Langdon, P., & Clarkson, P. J. (2009). Towards an Account of Sensorimotor Knowledge in Inclusive Product Design. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: Addressing Diversity, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5614, pp. 251–260). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02707-9_28

  5. Hurtienne, J., Stößel, C., & Weber, K. (2009). Sad is Heavy and Happy is Light - Population Stereotypes of Tangible Object Attributes. In N. Villar, S. Izadi, M. Fraser, S. Benford, D. Kern & A. Sahami (Eds.), TEI’09 Third International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 61-68). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1517664.1517686

  6. Wechsung, I., Hurtienne, J., & Naumann, A. (2009). Multimodale Interaktion: Intuitiv, robust, bevorzugt und altersgerecht? In H. Wandke, S. Kain, & D. Struve (Eds.). Mensch & Computer 2009: Grenzenlos frei!? (pp. 213-222). München: Oldenbourg.

  7. Israel, J.H. & Hurtienne, J. (2009). Regarding the Physical/Digital Seam in Design for Intuitive Interaction. In S. Kain, D. Struve, & H. Wandke (Eds.). Workshop-Proceedings der Tagung Mensch & Computer 2009: Grenzenlos frei!? (pp. 85-89). Berlin: Logos.

  8. Naumann, A.B., Hurtienne, J., Kindsmüller, M.C., Pohlmeyer, A.E., Clemens, C., Knapheide, C., Mohs, C., Israel, J.H., & IUUI Research Group (2009). Exploring Design Criteria for Intuitive Use. In S. Kain, D. Struve, & H. Wandke (Eds.). Workshop-Proceedings der Tagung Mensch & Computer 2009: Grenzenlos frei!? (pp. 73-75). Berlin: Logos.

  9. Naumann, A., Wechsung, I., & Hurtienne, J. (2009). Multimodal Interaction: Intuitive, Robust, and Preferred? In T. Gross, J. Gulliksen, P. Kotzé, L. Oestreicher, P. Palanque, R. O. Prates, & M. Winckler (Eds.): Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5727, pp. 93–96). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_14

  10. Langdon, P. & Hurtienne, J. (2009). Is Prior Experience the same as Intuition in the context of Inclusive Design? In HCI 2009 Electronic Proceedings: WS4 – Prior Experience. Cambridge: British Computer Society. Paper

  11. Hurtienne, J., & Langdon, P. (2009). Prior Knowledge in Inclusive Design: The Older, the More Intuitive? In HCI 2009 Electronic Proceedings: WS4 – Prior Experience. Cambridge: British Computer Society. Paper

  12. Naumann, A., Wechsung, I., & Hurtienne, J. (2009). Multimodality, Inclusive Design, and Intuitive Use. In HCI 2009 Electronic Proceedings: WS4 – Prior Experience. Cambridge: British Computer Society. Paper

2008

  1. Hurtienne, J., Israel, J. H., & Weber, K. (2008). Cooking up real world business applications combining physicality, digitality, and image schemas. In A. Schmidt , H. Gellersen, E. van den Hoven, A. Mazalek, P. Holleis, & N. Villar (Eds.), TEI'08. Second International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 239-246). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1347390.1347443

  2. Müller, C., Hurtienne, J., & Prümper, J. (2008). Benutzbarkeit ≠ Gebrauchstauglichkeit: Usability Management für den SAP®-Anwender [Usefulness ≠ usability: Usability Management for SAP® users], i-com Zeitschrift für interaktive und kooperative Medien, 7(2), 48-51. doi: 10.1524/icom.2008.0023

  3. Hurtienne, J., Weber, K., & Blessing, L. (2008). Prior Experience and Intuitive Use: Image Schemas in User Centred Design. In P. Langdon, P. J. Clarkson, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Designing Inclusive Futures (pp. 107-116). London: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84800-211-1_11

  4. Theißing, F., Prümper, J. & Hurtienne, J. (2008). Usability Management im Einführungsprozess: Ein Vorgehensmodell für die Einführung betrieblicher Standardsoftware [Usability Management in the implementation process: a process model for the implementation of standard business software]. In R. Höhn, R. Petrasch, O. Linssen (Hrsg.), Vorgehensmodelle und der Product Lifecycle - Projekt und Betrieb von IT Lösungen. (S. 120-133). Aachen: Shaker.

  5. Müller, C., Hurtienne, J., & Prümper, J. (2008). Standardsoftware – benutzbar und gebrauchstauglich! [Standard software applications – useful and usable], Computer und Arbeit, (5), 20-24.

2007

  1. Hurtienne, J. & Israel, J. H. (2007). Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions – Intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. In B. Ullmer, A. Schmidt, E. Hornecker, C. Hummels, R.J.K. Jacob, & E. van den Hoven (Eds), TEI'07. First International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 127-134). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1226969.1226996  ***Runner-Up at the TEI Lasting Impact Student Design Award at TEI 2016 ***

  2. Naumann, A., Hurtienne, J., Israel, J. H., Mohs, C., Kindsmüller, M. C., Meyer, H. A., & Hußlein, S. (2007). Intuitive Use of User Interfaces: Defining a vague concept. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 128-136). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73331-7_14

  3. Hurtienne, J. & Blessing, L. (2007). Design for Intuitive Use – Testing image schema theory for user interface design. In ICED 07 Paris, 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Proceedings of the conference (P_386, pp. 1-12). [CD-ROM]. Paris: Ecole Centrale. Paper

  4. Blackler, A. & Hurtienne, J. (2007). Towards a unified view of intuitive interaction: definitions, models and tools across the world, MMI-interaktiv, 13, 36-54. Paper

  5. Hurtienne, J. & Blessing, L. (2007). Metaphors as Tools for Intuitive Interaction with Technology. metaphorik.de, 12, 21-52. Paper

  6. Hurtienne, J., Thüring, M., & Blessing, L. (2007). Image schemas: a new language for user interface design? In M. Rötting, G. Wozny, A. Klostermann, & J. Huss (Eds.), Prospektive Gestaltung von Mensch-Technik-Interaktion (pp. 167-172). Düsseldorf: VDI.

  7. Barz, T., Bruder, C., Clemens, C., Dzaack, J., Glaser, C., Gross, B., Heinath, M., Hurtienne, J., Huss, J., Israel, J.H., Klostermann, A., Krinner, C., Lichtenstein, A., Mohs, C., & Pape, N. (2007). Das Graduiertenkolleg prometei - Ergebnisse interdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit im Bereich Mensch-Technik-Interaktion [The research training group prometei – Results of interdisciplinary collaboration in the area of human-technology interaction]. In M. Rötting, G. Wozny, A. Klostermann & J. Huss (Eds.), Prospektive Gestaltung von Mensch-Technik-Interaktion (pp. 287-296). Düsseldorf: VDI.

  8. Hußlein, S., Hurtienne, J., Israel, J. H., Mohs, C., Kindsmüller, M. C., Meyer, H. A., Naumann, A., & Pohlmeyer, A. E. (2007). Intuitive Nutzung - nur ein Schlagwort? [Intuitive use – only a buzzword?]. design report, 07 (11), 26-27.

  9. Abele, P., Hurtienne, J., & Prümper, J. (Eds.). (2007). Usability Management bei SAP-Projekten. Grundlagen – Vorgehen – Methoden [Usability Management for SAP projects. Foundations – Process -  Methods]. Wiesbaden: Vieweg. doi:10.1007/978-3-8348-9404-5

  10. Hurtienne, J., Abele, P., & Prümper, J. (2007). Usability bei SAP-Projekten [Usability in SAP projects]. In P. Abele, J. Hurtienne, & J. Prümper (Eds.), Usability Management bei SAP-Projekten. Grundlagen – Vorgehen – Methoden (pp. 1-21). Wiesbaden: Vieweg. doi:10.1007/978-3-8348-9404-5_1

  11. Hurtienne, J. & Prümper, J. (2007). Produktivitätsfaktor Usability Management [Usability Management as a productivity factor]. In P. Abele, J. Hurtienne & J. Prümper (Eds.), Usability Management bei SAP-Projekten. Grundlagen – Vorgehen – Methoden (pp. 23-50). Wiesbaden: Vieweg. doi:10.1007/978-3-8348-9404-5_2

  12. Prümper, J. & Hurtienne, J. (2007). Gesetze, Verordnungen, Normen [Laws, regulations, standards]. In P. Abele, J. Hurtienne & J. Prümper (Eds.), Usability Management bei SAP-Projekten. Grundlagen – Vorgehen – Methoden (pp. 51-77). Wiesbaden: Vieweg. doi:10.1007/978-3-8348-9404-5_3

  13. Hurtienne, J. & Abele, P. (2007). Anforderungsanalyse [Requirements anaysis]. In P. Abele, J. Hurtienne & J. Prümper (Eds.), Usability Management bei SAP-Projekten. Grundlagen – Vorgehen – Methoden (pp. 132-171). Wiesbaden: Vieweg. doi:10.1007/978-3-8348-9404-5_6

  14. Hurtienne, J. & Prümper, J. (2007). Vom Zauberer zum Partner – Usability Beratung im Spiegel organisationaler Reife [From magician to partner – Usability consulting in the mirror of organisational maturity]. In V. Nissen (Ed.), Consulting Research: Unternehmensberatung aus wissenschaftlicher Perspektive (pp. 309-327). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag. Paper

  15. Prümper, J. & Hurtienne, J. (2007). Hauptsache Computerarbeit!? Durch Usability-Management zu mehr Wohlbefinden, Gesundheit und Produktivität [The main thing is computer work!? Towards more well-being, health, and productivity by Usability Management]. In J. Fischer & E. Nullmeier (Eds.), Hauptsache Arbeit!? (pp. 149-173). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Paper

  16. Prümper, J. & Hurtienne, J. (2007). Usability is easy to use: Some background on standards and processes. In Y. Sundblad & Å. Walldius (Eds.), UITQ 2007 - User-driven IT Design and Quality Assurance (pp. 47-52). Stockholm, KTH.

2006

  1. Mohs, C., Hurtienne, J., Israel, J. H., Naumann, A., Kindsmüller, M. C., Meyer, H.A., & Pohlmeyer, A. (2006). IUUI – Intuitive Use of User Interfaces. In T. Bosenick, M. Hassenzahl, M. Müller-Prove, & M. Peissner (Eds.), Usability Professionals 06 (pp. 130-133). Stuttgart: German Chapter der Usability Professionals' Association.

  2. Mohs, C., Hurtienne, J. , Kindsmüller, M. C. , Israel, J. H. , Meyer, H. A. & die IUUI Research Group (2006). IUUI – Intuitive Use of User Interfaces: Auf dem Weg zu einer wissenschaftlichen Basis für das Schlagwort “Intuitivität” [IUUI – Intuitive Use of User Interfaces: On the way towards a scientific basis for the buzzword “intuitivity”]. MMI-Interaktiv, 11, 75-84. Paper

  3. Hurtienne, J., Mohs, C., Meyer, H.A., Kindsmüller, M. C., Israel, J. H. & die IUUI Research Group (2006). Intuitive Use of User Interfaces - Definition und Herausforderungen [Intuitive Use of User Interfaces – Definition and Challenges]. i-com Zeitschrift für interaktive und kooperative Medien, 5 (3), 38-41. doi:10.1524/icom.2006.5.3.38

  4. Abele, P., Hurtienne, J., & Prümper, J. (2006). Wertewandel bei der SAP-Einführung: durch Usability Management zu mehr Benutzerorientierung [Changing values in implementing SAP: Enhancing user orientation by Usability Management]. In B. Klauk & M. Stangel-Meseke (Eds.), Mit Werten wirtschaften – Mit Trends trumpfen (pp. 101-124). Lengerich u.a.: Papst Science. Paper

  5. Mohs, C., Hurtienne, J., Scholz, D., & Rötting, M. (2006). Intuitivität: definierbar, beeinflussbar, überprüfbar! [Intuitivity: definable, influenceable, testable!] In VDI / VDE-Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik (Eds.) Useware 2006 (pp. 215-224). Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.

2005

  1. Prümper, J., Vöhringer-Kuhnt, T., & Hurtienne, J. (2005). UsersAward – first Results of a Pilot Study in Germany [On-line]. In P. Brödner, Y. Sundblad, & Å. Walldius (Eds.), UITQ 2005 - International Research Workshop on User-driven IT Design and Quality Assurance: “Who can judge IT quality better than professional end-users?” (pp. 5-8). Proceedings

  2. Prümper, J., Vöhringer-Kuhnt, T., Hurtienne, J., Heegner, S., Linz, R., & Floegel, S. (2005). UsersAward: eine schwedische Initiative für mehr Benutzungsfreundlichkeit [UsersAward: A Swedish initiative towards more user-friendliness]. In C. Stary (Ed.), Mensch & Computer 2005: Kunst und Wissenschaft - Grenzüberschreitung der interaktiven ART (pp.257-258). München: Oldenbourg.

  3. Glaser, C., Hurtienne, J., & Mohs, C. (2005). Intuitiv und effizient – Thesen zur Intuitivität von User Interfaces [Intuitive and efficient – Theses on the intuitivity of user interfaces]. In M. Hassenzahl & M. Peissner (Eds.), Usability Professionals 2005 (pp. 146-149). Stuttgart: German Chapter der Usability Professionals' Association.

  4. Vöhringer-Kuhnt, T., Hurtienne, J., Prümper, J., Heegner, S. Floegel, S., & Linz, R. (2005). UsersAward – erste Erfahrungen mit der deutschen Version eines schwedischen Instruments zur benutzerzentrierten Software-Zertifizierung [UsersAward – First experiences with the German version of a Swedish instrument of user-centred software certification]. Berichte aus dem Psychologischen Institut der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 31(1), B-153-B-154.

  5. Hurtienne, J. (2005). Metaphern im User Interface Design - Typen, Relationen, relevante Forschungsfragen [Metaphors in user interface design – Types, relations, relevant research questions]. In L. Urbas & C. Steffens (Eds.), Zustandserkennung und Systemgestaltung (pp.223-226). Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.

  6. Hurtienne, J., Prümper, J., & Vöhringer-Kuhnt, T. (2005). UsersAward: Ein nutzerzentriertes Programm zur benutzerzentrierten Entwicklung und Zertifizierung von Mensch-Maschine Systemen [UsersAward: a user-centred programme for the user-centred development and certification of human-machine systems]. In L. Urbas & C. Steffens (Eds.), Zustandserkennung und Systemgestaltung (pp.149-154). Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.

2004

  1. Hurtienne, J. & Prümper, J. (2004). Gebrauchstauglichkeit von Software: ein vernachlässigtes Konstrukt in der Stressforschung? [Software usability: a construct neglected by stress research?] In T. Rammsayer, S. Grabianowski & S. Troche (Eds.), Berichte über den 44. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (p. 191). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers. Abstract

  2. Hurtienne, J., Abele, P., Floegel, S., Prümper, J., & Stein, B. (2004). Usability von SAP-Systemen: Interventionen und Ergebnisse des Ergusto-Projektes [Usability of SAP systems: Interventions and results of the Ergusto project]. In M. Hassenzahl & M. Peissner (Eds.), Usability Professionals 2004 (pp. 34-37). Paderborn: German Chapter der Usability Professionals' Association e.V.

  3. Hurtienne, J., Abele, P., Floegel, S., Prümper, J., & Stein, B. (2004). Usability direkt bei der Einführung von SAP-Systemen: Das Projekt ErgoCust [Applying usability directly in the process of implementing SAP systems: the ErgoCust project]. In M. Hassenzahl & M. Peissner (Eds.), Usability Professionals 2004 (pp. 38-41). Paderborn: German Chapter der Usability Professionals' Association e.V.

2003

  1. Hurtienne, J. & Prümper, J. (2003). Stress in the office: the influence of software-ergonomic quality. In D. Harris, V. Duffy, M. Smith, & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Human-Centred Computing: Cognitive, Social, and Ergonomic Aspects (pp. 63-67). Mahwah, N.J., London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Paper

  2. Hurtienne, J. & Prümper, J. (2003). Introducing SAP R/3: Participation of end-users and its effects on ergonomic quality, system knowledge, and stress. XI th European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology. Lisboa, Portugal [CD-ROM].

2002

  1. Hurtienne, J., Prümper, J. & Linz, R. (2002). Ergusto: The ergonomics of work with SAP R/3. In H. Luczak, A.E. Çakir & G. Çakir (Eds.), WWDU2002 - Work with Display Units: World Wide Work (pp. 293-295). Berlin: Ergonomic.

  2. Hurtienne, J. & Prümper, J. (2002). Software dient dem Menschen [Software serves people]. CoPers e-HR Personalarbeit, 2, 32-37.

  3. Hurtienne, J., Prümper, J., Floegel, S., Kuhl, M., Linz, R., Pohl, J., & Stein, B. (2002). Ergonomic Customizing bei SAP R/3 – Das Projekt Ergusto [Ergonomic Customising of SAP R/3 – the Ergusto project]. In J. Herczeg, H. Prinz, & H. Oberquelle (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2002 - Vom interaktiven Werkzeug zu kooperativen Arbeits- und Lernwelten (pp. 401-402). Stuttgart: Teubner. Paper

  4. Hurtienne, J. & Prümper, J. (2002). Partizipation und Customizing bei SAP R/3 [Participation and customising of SAP R/3]. In E. van der Meer, H. Hagendorf, R. Beyer, F. Krüger, A. Nuthmann, & S. Schulz (Eds.), Berichte über den 43. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (p. 136). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

2001

  1. Seifert, K., Liu, J., Hurtienne, J., & Baumgarten, T. (2001). Development of an evaluation concept for a multimodal computer system. In G. Johannsen (Ed.), 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems (pp.53-58). Düsseldorf: VDI/VDE-GMA.

  2. Seifert, K., Hurtienne, J., & Baumgarten, T. (2001). Untersuchung von Gestaltungsvarianten blickgestützter Mensch-Computer-Interaktion [Investigating design alternatives of gaze-supported human-computer interaction]. In H. Oberquelle, R. Oppermann, & J. Krause (Eds.), Mensch & Computer 2001: 1. Fachübergreifende Konferenz (pp.245-254). Stuttgart: Teubner. Paper

  3. Liu, J., Pastoor, S., Seifert, K., & Hurtienne, J. (2001). Three-dimensional PC: toward novel forms of human-computer interaction. In B. Javidi & F. Okano (Eds.), Three-dimensional Video and Display: Devices and Systems. Proceedings of the SPIE Conference, Vol. CR 76 (pp. 250-281). Bellingham, USA. Paper

1999

  1. Wandke, H. & Hurtienne, J. (1999). Zum Navigationsverhalten von Anfängern im World Wide Web [Navigational behaviour of beginners in the World Wide Web]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 43 (1), 46-54. doi:10.1026//0932-4089.43.1.46

  2. Wandke, H. & Hurtienne, J. (1999). Psychologische Analysen und Gestaltungsvorschläge zur Informationsauswahl im World Wide Web [Psychological analyses and design recommendations on selecting information in the World Wide Web]. In W. Wirth & W. Schweiger (Eds.), Selektion im Internet (pp. 271-292). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

1997

  1. Hurtienne, J. & Wandke, H. (1997). Wie effektiv und effizient navigieren Benutzer im World Wide Web? Eine empirische Studie [How effectively and efficiently do users navigate the World Wide Web? An empirical study]. IIG-Berichte, 1997 (1), 93-104.